Comparative Study
Comparative study between different Techniques of Follicular Hair Transplantation
Conventional Technology | Advanced Technology |
Manual conventional technique presently used by majority of clinics worldwide. | Automated state of the art technology of the future used only by leading clinics of the world. |
Less Detectable | Totally Undetectable |
Better than slit or punch grafting, still minor risk of detect ability. | Totally undetectable results even after 1 session as absolutely free from transplant defaults mentioned under Slit/plug grafting. |
Painful Anesthesia | Painless Anesthesia |
Local anesthesia is painful as it is also applied with conventional syringes. | Local anesthesia is virtually painless and safe as applied with special computerized system. |
Low Quality Grafts | Fine Quality Grafts |
Dissection is done under 3-4 x loops or optivisors witch may cause damage to the grafts. | Dissection is supervised under 10-2o x stereo- dissecting microscope which leades to yield 20-30% extra follicles of uniform and précised quality. |
Higher Surgical Trauma | Least Surgical Trauma |
Site wounds are made with SP90 & SP91 mini blades causing less injury or trauma to the scalp. | No incisions or “Sites” wounds are required to be made prior to graft implantation. |
Manual Placement | No-touch Placement |
Grafts are placed, manually, with conventional forceps, risking them of being damaged | Individual follicles are embedded onto the scalp, using special implanting device, without holding the graft tissue, directly. Which ensures absolute safety of the follicles and, consequently, higher growth rate of of transplanted hair. |
Uncontrolled Hair Direction | Controlled Hair Direction |
Direction of transplanted hair cannot be, precisely’ controlled | Direction of transplanted hair can be, precisely, controlled and maintained in 100% natural order. |
Conventional Bleeding Control | Advanced Bleeding Control System |
Bleeding is controlled using same conventional electro-cautery. | Bleeding controlled is established using worlds most advanced infra red laser blood coagulator which does not produce smoke ,odor and burned residues to ensures faster healing of donor area. |
Medium Density | Maximum Density |
Comparatively, larger no. of grafts can be transplanted in one session | Maximum no. of hair follicles can be transplanted in one session, with precision. |
Less Sessions Required | Minimum Sessions Required |
4-6 sessions are required to obtain the optimum density. | Only 2-3 sessions are required for the optimum density of hair. |
Higher Hair Survival Rate | Highest Hair Survival Rate |
A chance for survival of transplanted hair is between 70-80%. | A chance for re-growth of transplanted hair is established as 98-100%. |
Longer Procedure Time | Long Procedure Time |
Procedure time is higher than “Slit/punch Grafting”. | Procedure time is comparatively higher than “Slit/punch” & “Micro-Slit Grafting”. |
Medium Cost Procedure | Higher Cost Procedure |
Cost per session of procedure is more than “Slit/punch Grafting”. | Cost per session of “No-touch” procedure is higher than “Slit” and “Micro-SlitGrafting”. |
Long Healing Time | Quickest Healing Time |
Less healing time is required as compared to “Slit Grafting”. | Healing of wounds takes place much quicker than “Slit/punch” and “Micro Slit Grafting” |
Late Hair Growth | Rapid Hair Growth |
Re-growth of transplanted hair is quicker than “Slit Graft” transplantation. | Hair start growing again, comparatively, earlier than both “Slit/punch”& “Micro-Slit” Grafting, possibly because of least manipulation of the grafts. |
